CERN Accelerating science

The fit result compared to data projected in \mhbb for the muon event categories. The fit result is the filled histogram, with the different colors indicating different background categories. The background shape uncertainty is shown as the hatched band. Example spin-0 signal distributions for $\mx$ of 1 and 2.5\TeV are shown as solid lines, with the product of the cross section and branching fraction to two Higgs bosons set to 0.2\unit{pb}. The lower panels show ratio of the data to the fit result.

The fit result compared to data projected in \mhbb for the muon event categories. The fit result is the filled histogram, with the different colors indicating different background categories. The background shape uncertainty is shown as the hatched band. Example spin-0 signal distributions for $\mx$ of 1 and 2.5\TeV are shown as solid lines, with the product of the cross section and branching fraction to two Higgs bosons set to 0.2\unit{pb}. The lower panels show ratio of the data to the fit result.

The fit result compared to data projected in \mhbb for the muon event categories. The fit result is the filled histogram, with the different colors indicating different background categories. The background shape uncertainty is shown as the hatched band. Example spin-0 signal distributions for $\mx$ of 1 and 2.5\TeV are shown as solid lines, with the product of the cross section and branching fraction to two Higgs bosons set to 0.2\unit{pb}. The lower panels show ratio of the data to the fit result.

The fit result compared to data projected in \mhbb for the muon event categories. The fit result is the filled histogram, with the different colors indicating different background categories. The background shape uncertainty is shown as the hatched band. Example spin-0 signal distributions for $\mx$ of 1 and 2.5\TeV are shown as solid lines, with the product of the cross section and branching fraction to two Higgs bosons set to 0.2\unit{pb}. The lower panels show ratio of the data to the fit result.

The fit result compared to data projected in \mhbb for the electron event categories. The fit result is the filled histogram, with the different colors indicating different background categories. The background shape uncertainty is shown as the hatched band. Example spin-0 signal distributions for $\mx$ of 1 and 2.5\TeV are shown as solid lines, with the product of the cross section and branching fraction to two Higgs bosons set to 0.2\unit{pb}. The lower panels show ratio of the data to the fit result.

Pre-modeling and pre-fit distributions of the discriminating variables, which are described in the text, are shown for data (points) and SM processes (filled histograms) as predicted directly from simulation. The statistical uncertainty of the simulated sample is shown as the hatched band. The solid lines correspond to spin-0 signals for $\mx$ of 1 and 2.5\TeV. The product of the cross section and branching fraction to two Higgs bosons is set to 2\unit{pb} for both signal models. The lower panels show the ratio of the data to the sum of all background processes.

The fit result compared to data projected in \mhbb for the electron event categories. The fit result is the filled histogram, with the different colors indicating different background categories. The background shape uncertainty is shown as the hatched band. Example spin-0 signal distributions for $\mx$ of 1 and 2.5\TeV are shown as solid lines, with the product of the cross section and branching fraction to two Higgs bosons set to 0.2\unit{pb}. The lower panels show ratio of the data to the fit result.

The fit result compared to data projected in \mhh for the muon event categories. The fit result is the filled histogram, with the different colors indicating different background categories. The background shape uncertainty is shown as the hatched band. Example spin-0 signal distributions for $\mx$ of 1 and 2.5\TeV are shown as solid lines, with the product of the cross section and branching fraction to two Higgs bosons set to 0.2\unit{pb}. The lower panels show ratio of the data to the fit result.

Observed and expected 95\% \CL upper limits on the product of the cross section and branching fraction to $\PH\PH$ for a generic spin-0 (left) and spin-2 (right) boson $\PX$, as a function of mass. Example radion and bulk graviton predictions are also shown. The $\PH\PH$ branching fraction is assumed to be 25 and 10\%, respectively.

Pre-modeling and pre-fit distributions of the discriminating variables, which are described in the text, are shown for data (points) and SM processes (filled histograms) as predicted directly from simulation. The statistical uncertainty of the simulated sample is shown as the hatched band. The solid lines correspond to spin-0 signals for $\mx$ of 1 and 2.5\TeV. The product of the cross section and branching fraction to two Higgs bosons is set to 2\unit{pb} for both signal models. The lower panels show the ratio of the data to the sum of all background processes.

The fit result compared to data projected in \mhh for the electron event categories. The fit result is the filled histogram, with the different colors indicating different background categories. The background shape uncertainty is shown as the hatched band. Example spin-0 signal distributions for $\mx$ of 1 and 2.5\TeV are shown as solid lines, with the product of the cross section and branching fraction to two Higgs bosons set to 0.2\unit{pb}. The lower panels show ratio of the data to the fit result.

The fit result compared to data projected in \mhbb for the muon event categories. The fit result is the filled histogram, with the different colors indicating different background categories. The background shape uncertainty is shown as the hatched band. Example spin-0 signal distributions for $\mx$ of 1 and 2.5\TeV are shown as solid lines, with the product of the cross section and branching fraction to two Higgs bosons set to 0.2\unit{pb}. The lower panels show ratio of the data to the fit result.

Pre-modeling and pre-fit distributions of the discriminating variables, which are described in the text, are shown for data (points) and SM processes (filled histograms) as predicted directly from simulation. The statistical uncertainty of the simulated sample is shown as the hatched band. The solid lines correspond to spin-0 signals for $\mx$ of 1 and 2.5\TeV. The product of the cross section and branching fraction to two Higgs bosons is set to 2\unit{pb} for both signal models. The lower panels show the ratio of the data to the sum of all background processes.

The fit result compared to data projected in \mhbb for the electron event categories. The fit result is the filled histogram, with the different colors indicating different background categories. The background shape uncertainty is shown as the hatched band. Example spin-0 signal distributions for $\mx$ of 1 and 2.5\TeV are shown as solid lines, with the product of the cross section and branching fraction to two Higgs bosons set to 0.2\unit{pb}. The lower panels show ratio of the data to the fit result.

The fit result compared to data projected in \mhh for the electron event categories. The fit result is the filled histogram, with the different colors indicating different background categories. The background shape uncertainty is shown as the hatched band. Example spin-0 signal distributions for $\mx$ of 1 and 2.5\TeV are shown as solid lines, with the product of the cross section and branching fraction to two Higgs bosons set to 0.2\unit{pb}. The lower panels show ratio of the data to the fit result.

The fit result compared to data projected in \mhbb for the electron event categories. The fit result is the filled histogram, with the different colors indicating different background categories. The background shape uncertainty is shown as the hatched band. Example spin-0 signal distributions for $\mx$ of 1 and 2.5\TeV are shown as solid lines, with the product of the cross section and branching fraction to two Higgs bosons set to 0.2\unit{pb}. The lower panels show ratio of the data to the fit result.

The fit result compared to data in the $\ttbar$~CR (upper plots) and \qgn~CR (lower plots), projected in \mhbb (left) and \mhh (right). Events from all categories are combined. The fit result is the filled histogram, with the different colors indicating different background categories. The background shape uncertainty is shown as the hatched band. The lower panels show ratio of the data to the fit result.

The fit result compared to data in the $\ttbar$~CR (upper plots) and \qgn~CR (lower plots), projected in \mhbb (left) and \mhh (right). Events from all categories are combined. The fit result is the filled histogram, with the different colors indicating different background categories. The background shape uncertainty is shown as the hatched band. The lower panels show ratio of the data to the fit result.

The fit result compared to data projected in \mhh for the muon event categories. The fit result is the filled histogram, with the different colors indicating different background categories. The background shape uncertainty is shown as the hatched band. Example spin-0 signal distributions for $\mx$ of 1 and 2.5\TeV are shown as solid lines, with the product of the cross section and branching fraction to two Higgs bosons set to 0.2\unit{pb}. The lower panels show ratio of the data to the fit result.

Observed and expected 95\% \CL upper limits on the product of the cross section and branching fraction to $\PH\PH$ for a generic spin-0 (left) and spin-2 (right) boson $\PX$, as a function of mass. Example radion and bulk graviton predictions are also shown. The $\PH\PH$ branching fraction is assumed to be 25 and 10\%, respectively.

The fit result compared to data projected in \mhh for the electron event categories. The fit result is the filled histogram, with the different colors indicating different background categories. The background shape uncertainty is shown as the hatched band. Example spin-0 signal distributions for $\mx$ of 1 and 2.5\TeV are shown as solid lines, with the product of the cross section and branching fraction to two Higgs bosons set to 0.2\unit{pb}. The lower panels show ratio of the data to the fit result.

The fit result compared to data projected in \mhh for the electron event categories. The fit result is the filled histogram, with the different colors indicating different background categories. The background shape uncertainty is shown as the hatched band. Example spin-0 signal distributions for $\mx$ of 1 and 2.5\TeV are shown as solid lines, with the product of the cross section and branching fraction to two Higgs bosons set to 0.2\unit{pb}. The lower panels show ratio of the data to the fit result.

Pre-modeling and pre-fit distributions of the discriminating variables, which are described in the text, are shown for data (points) and SM processes (filled histograms) as predicted directly from simulation. The statistical uncertainty of the simulated sample is shown as the hatched band. The solid lines correspond to spin-0 signals for $\mx$ of 1 and 2.5\TeV. The product of the cross section and branching fraction to two Higgs bosons is set to 2\unit{pb} for both signal models. The lower panels show the ratio of the data to the sum of all background processes.

The fit result compared to data projected in \mhbb for the muon event categories. The fit result is the filled histogram, with the different colors indicating different background categories. The background shape uncertainty is shown as the hatched band. Example spin-0 signal distributions for $\mx$ of 1 and 2.5\TeV are shown as solid lines, with the product of the cross section and branching fraction to two Higgs bosons set to 0.2\unit{pb}. The lower panels show ratio of the data to the fit result.

The fit result compared to data in the $\ttbar$~CR (upper plots) and \qgn~CR (lower plots), projected in \mhbb (left) and \mhh (right). Events from all categories are combined. The fit result is the filled histogram, with the different colors indicating different background categories. The background shape uncertainty is shown as the hatched band. The lower panels show ratio of the data to the fit result.

The fit result compared to data in the $\ttbar$~CR (upper plots) and \qgn~CR (lower plots), projected in \mhbb (left) and \mhh (right). Events from all categories are combined. The fit result is the filled histogram, with the different colors indicating different background categories. The background shape uncertainty is shown as the hatched band. The lower panels show ratio of the data to the fit result.

The fit result compared to data projected in \mhh for the muon event categories. The fit result is the filled histogram, with the different colors indicating different background categories. The background shape uncertainty is shown as the hatched band. Example spin-0 signal distributions for $\mx$ of 1 and 2.5\TeV are shown as solid lines, with the product of the cross section and branching fraction to two Higgs bosons set to 0.2\unit{pb}. The lower panels show ratio of the data to the fit result.

The fit result compared to data projected in \mhbb for the electron event categories. The fit result is the filled histogram, with the different colors indicating different background categories. The background shape uncertainty is shown as the hatched band. Example spin-0 signal distributions for $\mx$ of 1 and 2.5\TeV are shown as solid lines, with the product of the cross section and branching fraction to two Higgs bosons set to 0.2\unit{pb}. The lower panels show ratio of the data to the fit result.

The fit result compared to data projected in \mhh for the muon event categories. The fit result is the filled histogram, with the different colors indicating different background categories. The background shape uncertainty is shown as the hatched band. Example spin-0 signal distributions for $\mx$ of 1 and 2.5\TeV are shown as solid lines, with the product of the cross section and branching fraction to two Higgs bosons set to 0.2\unit{pb}. The lower panels show ratio of the data to the fit result.

The fit result compared to data projected in \mhh for the muon event categories. The fit result is the filled histogram, with the different colors indicating different background categories. The background shape uncertainty is shown as the hatched band. Example spin-0 signal distributions for $\mx$ of 1 and 2.5\TeV are shown as solid lines, with the product of the cross section and branching fraction to two Higgs bosons set to 0.2\unit{pb}. The lower panels show ratio of the data to the fit result.

The fit result compared to data projected in \mhbb for the electron event categories. The fit result is the filled histogram, with the different colors indicating different background categories. The background shape uncertainty is shown as the hatched band. Example spin-0 signal distributions for $\mx$ of 1 and 2.5\TeV are shown as solid lines, with the product of the cross section and branching fraction to two Higgs bosons set to 0.2\unit{pb}. The lower panels show ratio of the data to the fit result.

The fit result compared to data projected in \mhh for the muon event categories. The fit result is the filled histogram, with the different colors indicating different background categories. The background shape uncertainty is shown as the hatched band. Example spin-0 signal distributions for $\mx$ of 1 and 2.5\TeV are shown as solid lines, with the product of the cross section and branching fraction to two Higgs bosons set to 0.2\unit{pb}. The lower panels show ratio of the data to the fit result.

The fit result compared to data projected in \mhh for the electron event categories. The fit result is the filled histogram, with the different colors indicating different background categories. The background shape uncertainty is shown as the hatched band. Example spin-0 signal distributions for $\mx$ of 1 and 2.5\TeV are shown as solid lines, with the product of the cross section and branching fraction to two Higgs bosons set to 0.2\unit{pb}. The lower panels show ratio of the data to the fit result.

The fit result compared to data projected in \mhh for the electron event categories. The fit result is the filled histogram, with the different colors indicating different background categories. The background shape uncertainty is shown as the hatched band. Example spin-0 signal distributions for $\mx$ of 1 and 2.5\TeV are shown as solid lines, with the product of the cross section and branching fraction to two Higgs bosons set to 0.2\unit{pb}. The lower panels show ratio of the data to the fit result.