 | Examples of the \EToverPT distribution and fit performed in the $16<\pTtrack<20$~\GeV\ (top), $30<\pTtrack<50$~\GeV\ (middle) and $100<\pTtrack<150$~\GeV\ (bottom) bins in the barrel (left) and endcaps (right). The data are shown by points with a stacked histogram for simulation. The component where $\tau$-leptons decay to multiple charged pions is small and difficult to see. The red fits correspond to simulation and the green fits to data. Both the fits to the full distribution of a Gaussian+Landau function and just the Landau component from this fit are shown. The uncertainties shown are those from the statistics of the dataset and the limited Monte Carlo sample size. The bottom panel shows the ratio of data to simulation with statistical error bars on the data points and a yellow band illustrating the statistical uncertainty of the simulation. The simulation is normalised to the integral of the data. |
 | Examples of the \EToverPT distribution and fit performed in the $16<\pTtrack<20$~\GeV\ (top), $30<\pTtrack<50$~\GeV\ (middle) and $100<\pTtrack<150$~\GeV\ (bottom) bins in the barrel (left) and endcaps (right). The data are shown by points with a stacked histogram for simulation. The component where $\tau$-leptons decay to multiple charged pions is small and difficult to see. The red fits correspond to simulation and the yellow fits correspond to data. Both the fits to the full distribution of a Gaussian+Landau function and just the Landau component from this fit are shown. The uncertainties shown are those from the statistics of the dataset and the limited Monte Carlo sample size. The bottom panel shows the ratio of data to simulation with statistical error bars on the data points and a yellow band illustrating the statistical uncertainty of the simulation. The simulation is normalised to the integral of the data. |
 | Examples of the \EToverPT distribution and fit performed in the $16<\pTtrack<20$~\GeV\ (top), $30<\pTtrack<50$~\GeV\ (middle) and $100<\pTtrack<150$~\GeV\ (bottom) bins in the barrel (left) and endcaps (right). The data are shown by points with a stacked histogram for simulation. The component where $\tau$-leptons decay to multiple charged pions is small and difficult to see. The red fits correspond to simulation and the green fits to data. Both the fits to the full distribution of a Gaussian+Landau function and just the Landau component from this fit are shown. The uncertainties shown are those from the statistics of the dataset and the limited Monte Carlo sample size. The bottom panel shows the ratio of data to simulation with statistical error bars on the data points and a yellow band illustrating the statistical uncertainty of the simulation. The simulation is normalised to the integral of the data. |
 | Examples of the \EToverPT distribution and fit performed in the $16<\pTtrack<20$~\GeV\ (top), $30<\pTtrack<50$~\GeV\ (middle) and $100<\pTtrack<150$~\GeV\ (bottom) bins in the barrel (left) and endcaps (right). The data are shown by points with a stacked histogram for simulation. The component where $\tau$-leptons decay to multiple charged pions is small and difficult to see. The red fits correspond to simulation and the yellow fits correspond to data. Both the fits to the full distribution of a Gaussian+Landau function and just the Landau component from this fit are shown. The uncertainties shown are those from the statistics of the dataset and the limited Monte Carlo sample size. The bottom panel shows the ratio of data to simulation with statistical error bars on the data points and a yellow band illustrating the statistical uncertainty of the simulation. The simulation is normalised to the integral of the data. |
 | Examples of the \EToverPT distribution and fit performed in the $16<\pTtrack<20$~\GeV\ (top), $30<\pTtrack<50$~\GeV\ (middle) and $100<\pTtrack<150$~\GeV\ (bottom) bins in the barrel (left) and endcaps (right). The data are shown by points with a stacked histogram for simulation. The component where $\tau$-leptons decay to multiple charged pions is small and difficult to see. The red fits correspond to simulation and the green fits to data. Both the fits to the full distribution of a Gaussian+Landau function and just the Landau component from this fit are shown. The uncertainties shown are those from the statistics of the dataset and the limited Monte Carlo sample size. The bottom panel shows the ratio of data to simulation with statistical error bars on the data points and a yellow band illustrating the statistical uncertainty of the simulation. The simulation is normalised to the integral of the data. |
 | Examples of the \EToverPT distribution and fit performed in the $16<\pTtrack<20$~\GeV\ (top), $30<\pTtrack<50$~\GeV\ (middle) and $100<\pTtrack<150$~\GeV\ (bottom) bins in the barrel (left) and endcaps (right). The data are shown by points with a stacked histogram for simulation. The component where $\tau$-leptons decay to multiple charged pions is small and difficult to see. The red fits correspond to simulation and the yellow fits correspond to data. Both the fits to the full distribution of a Gaussian+Landau function and just the Landau component from this fit are shown. The uncertainties shown are those from the statistics of the dataset and the limited Monte Carlo sample size. The bottom panel shows the ratio of data to simulation with statistical error bars on the data points and a yellow band illustrating the statistical uncertainty of the simulation. The simulation is normalised to the integral of the data. |
 | Examples of the \EToverPT distribution and fit performed in the $16<\pTtrack<20$~\GeV\ (top), $30<\pTtrack<50$~\GeV\ (middle) and $100<\pTtrack<150$~\GeV\ (bottom) bins in the barrel (left) and endcaps (right). The data are shown by points with a stacked histogram for simulation. The component where $\tau$-leptons decay to multiple charged pions is small and difficult to see. The red fits correspond to simulation and the green fits to data. Both the fits to the full distribution of a Gaussian+Landau function and just the Landau component from this fit are shown. The uncertainties shown are those from the statistics of the dataset and the limited Monte Carlo sample size. The bottom panel shows the ratio of data to simulation with statistical error bars on the data points and a yellow band illustrating the statistical uncertainty of the simulation. The simulation is normalised to the integral of the data. |
 | Examples of the \EToverPT distribution and fit performed in the $16<\pTtrack<20$~\GeV\ (top), $30<\pTtrack<50$~\GeV\ (middle) and $100<\pTtrack<150$~\GeV\ (bottom) bins in the barrel (left) and endcaps (right). The data are shown by points with a stacked histogram for simulation. The component where $\tau$-leptons decay to multiple charged pions is small and difficult to see. The red fits correspond to simulation and the yellow fits correspond to data. Both the fits to the full distribution of a Gaussian+Landau function and just the Landau component from this fit are shown. The uncertainties shown are those from the statistics of the dataset and the limited Monte Carlo sample size. The bottom panel shows the ratio of data to simulation with statistical error bars on the data points and a yellow band illustrating the statistical uncertainty of the simulation. The simulation is normalised to the integral of the data. |
 | Examples of the \EToverPT distribution and fit performed in the $16<\pTtrack<20$~\GeV\ (top), $30<\pTtrack<50$~\GeV\ (middle) and $100<\pTtrack<150$~\GeV\ (bottom) bins in the barrel (left) and endcaps (right). The data are shown by points with a stacked histogram for simulation. The component where $\tau$-leptons decay to multiple charged pions is small and difficult to see. The red fits correspond to simulation and the green fits to data. Both the fits to the full distribution of a Gaussian+Landau function and just the Landau component from this fit are shown. The uncertainties shown are those from the statistics of the dataset and the limited Monte Carlo sample size. The bottom panel shows the ratio of data to simulation with statistical error bars on the data points and a yellow band illustrating the statistical uncertainty of the simulation. The simulation is normalised to the integral of the data. |
 | Examples of the \EToverPT distribution and fit performed in the $16<\pTtrack<20$~\GeV\ (top), $30<\pTtrack<50$~\GeV\ (middle) and $100<\pTtrack<150$~\GeV\ (bottom) bins in the barrel (left) and endcaps (right). The data are shown by points with a stacked histogram for simulation. The component where $\tau$-leptons decay to multiple charged pions is small and difficult to see. The red fits correspond to simulation and the yellow fits correspond to data. Both the fits to the full distribution of a Gaussian+Landau function and just the Landau component from this fit are shown. The uncertainties shown are those from the statistics of the dataset and the limited Monte Carlo sample size. The bottom panel shows the ratio of data to simulation with statistical error bars on the data points and a yellow band illustrating the statistical uncertainty of the simulation. The simulation is normalised to the integral of the data. |
 | Examples of the \EToverPT distribution and fit performed in the $16<\pTtrack<20$~\GeV\ (top), $30<\pTtrack<50$~\GeV\ (middle) and $100<\pTtrack<150$~\GeV\ (bottom) bins in the barrel (left) and endcaps (right). The data are shown by points with a stacked histogram for simulation. The component where $\tau$-leptons decay to multiple charged pions is small and difficult to see. The red fits correspond to simulation and the green fits to data. Both the fits to the full distribution of a Gaussian+Landau function and just the Landau component from this fit are shown. The uncertainties shown are those from the statistics of the dataset and the limited Monte Carlo sample size. The bottom panel shows the ratio of data to simulation with statistical error bars on the data points and a yellow band illustrating the statistical uncertainty of the simulation. The simulation is normalised to the integral of the data. |
 | Examples of the \EToverPT distribution and fit performed in the $16<\pTtrack<20$~\GeV\ (top), $30<\pTtrack<50$~\GeV\ (middle) and $100<\pTtrack<150$~\GeV\ (bottom) bins in the barrel (left) and endcaps (right). The data are shown by points with a stacked histogram for simulation. The component where $\tau$-leptons decay to multiple charged pions is small and difficult to see. The red fits correspond to simulation and the yellow fits correspond to data. Both the fits to the full distribution of a Gaussian+Landau function and just the Landau component from this fit are shown. The uncertainties shown are those from the statistics of the dataset and the limited Monte Carlo sample size. The bottom panel shows the ratio of data to simulation with statistical error bars on the data points and a yellow band illustrating the statistical uncertainty of the simulation. The simulation is normalised to the integral of the data. |
 | The fitted mean of the \EToverPT distribution as a function of the track \pT in the central region (left) and endcap region (right). The error bars and uncertainty band show only the statistical uncertainties from the size of the dataset and simulated samples respectively. |
 | The fitted mean of the signal \EToverPT distribution as a function of the track \pT in the central region (left) and endcap region (right). The error bars and uncertainty band show only the statistical uncertainties from the size of the dataset and simulated samples respectively. |
 | The fitted mean of the \EToverPT distribution as a function of the track \pT in the central region (left) and endcap region (right). The error bars and uncertainty band show only the statistical uncertainties from the size of the dataset and simulated samples respectively. |
 | The fitted mean of the signal \EToverPT distribution as a function of the track \pT in the central region (left) and endcap region (right). The error bars and uncertainty band show only the statistical uncertainties from the size of the dataset and simulated samples respectively. |
 | The fitted mean of the \EToverPT distribution as a function of the track $|\eta^{\textrm{trk}}|$ in three different \pTtrack bins. The error bars and uncertainty band show only the statistical uncertainties from the size of the dataset and simulated samples respectively. |
 | The fitted mean of the signal \EToverPT distribution as a function of the track $|\eta^{\textrm{trk}}|$ in three different \pTtrack bins. The error bars and uncertainty band show only the statistical uncertainties from the size of the dataset and simulated samples respectively. |
 | The fitted mean of the \EToverPT distribution as a function of the track $|\eta^{\textrm{trk}}|$ in three different \pTtrack bins. The error bars and uncertainty band show only the statistical uncertainties from the size of the dataset and simulated samples respectively. |
 | The fitted mean of the signal \EToverPT distribution as a function of the track $|\eta^{\textrm{trk}}|$ in three different \pTtrack bins. The error bars and uncertainty band show only the statistical uncertainties from the size of the dataset and simulated samples respectively. |
 | The fitted mean of the \EToverPT distribution as a function of the track $|\eta^{\textrm{trk}}|$ in three different \pTtrack bins. The error bars and uncertainty band show only the statistical uncertainties from the size of the dataset and simulated samples respectively. |
 | The fitted mean of the signal \EToverPT distribution as a function of the track $|\eta^{\textrm{trk}}|$ in three different \pTtrack bins. The error bars and uncertainty band show only the statistical uncertainties from the size of the dataset and simulated samples respectively. |
 | The various systematic uncertainties which affect the measurement of the calorimeter energy scale as a function of \pTtrack in the central (left) and endcap (right) regions. |
 | The various systematic uncertainties which affect the measurement of the calorimeter energy scale for charged pions as a function of \pTtrack in the central (left) and endcap (right) regions. |
 | The various systematic uncertainties which affect the measurement of the calorimeter energy scale as a function of \pTtrack in the central (left) and endcap (right) regions. |
 | The various systematic uncertainties which affect the measurement of the calorimeter energy scale for charged pions as a function of \pTtrack in the central (left) and endcap (right) regions. |
 | The various systematic uncertainties which affect the measurement of the calorimeter energy scale as a function of $|\eta^{\textrm{trk}}|$ for three \pTtrack ranges: $30<\pTtrack<50$~\GeV, $50<\pTtrack<70$~\GeV\ and $70<\pTtrack<100$~\GeV. |
 | The various systematic uncertainties which affect the measurement of the calorimeter energy scale for charged pions as a function of $|\eta^{\textrm{trk}}|$ for three \pTtrack ranges: $30<\pTtrack<50$~\GeV, $50<\pTtrack<70$~\GeV\ and $70<\pTtrack<100$~\GeV. |
 | The various systematic uncertainties which affect the measurement of the calorimeter energy scale as a function of $|\eta^{\textrm{trk}}|$ for three \pTtrack ranges: $30<\pTtrack<50$~\GeV, $50<\pTtrack<70$~\GeV\ and $70<\pTtrack<100$~\GeV. |
 | The various systematic uncertainties which affect the measurement of the calorimeter energy scale for charged pions as a function of $|\eta^{\textrm{trk}}|$ for three \pTtrack ranges: $30<\pTtrack<50$~\GeV, $50<\pTtrack<70$~\GeV\ and $70<\pTtrack<100$~\GeV. |
 | The various systematic uncertainties which affect the measurement of the calorimeter energy scale as a function of $|\eta^{\textrm{trk}}|$ for three \pTtrack ranges: $30<\pTtrack<50$~\GeV, $50<\pTtrack<70$~\GeV\ and $70<\pTtrack<100$~\GeV. |
 | The various systematic uncertainties which affect the measurement of the calorimeter energy scale for charged pions as a function of $|\eta^{\textrm{trk}}|$ for three \pTtrack ranges: $30<\pTtrack<50$~\GeV, $50<\pTtrack<70$~\GeV\ and $70<\pTtrack<100$~\GeV. |
 | The measured data to simulation ratio of the response as a function of \pTtrack for the barrel (left) and endcaps (right). Points represent the different measurement bins with their total uncertainty from both the statistical and systematic sources. Also shown is the smooth calibration curve with its associated uncertainties. |
 | The measured data to simulation ratio of the response as a function of \pTtrack for the barrel (left) and endcaps (right). Points represent the different measurement bins with their total uncertainty from both the statistical and systematic sources. Also shown is the smooth calibration curve with its associated uncertainties. |
 | The measured data to simulation ratio of the response as a function of \pTtrack for the barrel (left) and endcaps (right). Points represent the different measurement bins with their total uncertainty from both the statistical and systematic sources. Also shown is the smooth calibration curve with its associated uncertainties. |
 | The measured data to simulation ratio of the response as a function of \pTtrack for the barrel (left) and endcaps (right). Points represent the different measurement bins with their total uncertainty from both the statistical and systematic sources. Also shown is the smooth calibration curve with its associated uncertainties. |
 | The measured data to simulation ratio of the response as a function of $|\eta^{\textrm{trk}}|$ for the three \pTtrack ranges: $30<\pTtrack<50$~\GeV, $50<\pTtrack<70$~\GeV\ and $70<\pTtrack<100$~\GeV. Inner error bars represent uncertainties from limited sample size and the outer error bars give the total uncertainty including both the statistical errors and systematic uncertainties. |
 | The measured data to simulation ratio of the response as a function of $|\eta^{\textrm{trk}}|$ for the three \pTtrack ranges: $30<\pTtrack<50$~\GeV, $50<\pTtrack<70$~\GeV\ and $70<\pTtrack<100$~\GeV. Inner error bars represent uncertainties from limited sample size and the outer error bars give the total uncertainty including both the statistical errors and systematic uncertainties. |
 | The measured data to simulation ratio of the response as a function of $|\eta^{\textrm{trk}}|$ for the three \pTtrack ranges: $30<\pTtrack<50$~\GeV, $50<\pTtrack<70$~\GeV\ and $70<\pTtrack<100$~\GeV. Inner error bars represent uncertainties from limited sample size and the outer error bars give the total uncertainty including both the statistical errors and systematic uncertainties. |
 | The measured data to simulation ratio of the response as a function of $|\eta^{\textrm{trk}}|$ for the three \pTtrack ranges: $30<\pTtrack<50$~\GeV, $50<\pTtrack<70$~\GeV\ and $70<\pTtrack<100$~\GeV. Inner error bars represent uncertainties from limited sample size and the outer error bars give the total uncertainty including both the statistical errors and systematic uncertainties. |
 | The measured data to simulation ratio of the response as a function of $|\eta^{\textrm{trk}}|$ for the three \pTtrack ranges: $30<\pTtrack<50$~\GeV, $50<\pTtrack<70$~\GeV\ and $70<\pTtrack<100$~\GeV. Inner error bars represent uncertainties from limited sample size and the outer error bars give the total uncertainty including both the statistical errors and systematic uncertainties. |
 | The measured data to simulation ratio of the response as a function of $|\eta^{\textrm{trk}}|$ for the three \pTtrack ranges: $30<\pTtrack<50$~\GeV, $50<\pTtrack<70$~\GeV\ and $70<\pTtrack<100$~\GeV. Inner error bars represent uncertainties from limited sample size and the outer error bars give the total uncertainty including both the statistical errors and systematic uncertainties. |
 | The fitted width divided by the mean of the \EToverPT distribution as a function of the track \pT in the central region (left) and endcap region (right). Also shown is the fitted width of the track \pT divided by the generator-level \pT for true $\tau\rightarrow\pi^\pm\nu$ events in simulation to give an illustration of the contribution to the total width from the resolution of reconstructed tracks. The uncertainties shown are only those from the limited number of events in the dataset and simulated samples. |
 | The fitted width divided by the mean of the signal \EToverPT distribution as a function of the track \pT in the central region (left) and endcap region (right). Also shown is the fitted width of the track \pT divided by the generator-level \pT for true $\tau\rightarrow\pi^\pm\nu_\tau$ events in simulation to give an illustration of the contribution to the total width from the resolution of reconstructed tracks. The uncertainties shown are only those from the limited number of events in the dataset and simulated samples. |
 | The fitted width divided by the mean of the \EToverPT distribution as a function of the track \pT in the central region (left) and endcap region (right). Also shown is the fitted width of the track \pT divided by the generator-level \pT for true $\tau\rightarrow\pi^\pm\nu$ events in simulation to give an illustration of the contribution to the total width from the resolution of reconstructed tracks. The uncertainties shown are only those from the limited number of events in the dataset and simulated samples. |
 | The fitted width divided by the mean of the signal \EToverPT distribution as a function of the track \pT in the central region (left) and endcap region (right). Also shown is the fitted width of the track \pT divided by the generator-level \pT for true $\tau\rightarrow\pi^\pm\nu_\tau$ events in simulation to give an illustration of the contribution to the total width from the resolution of reconstructed tracks. The uncertainties shown are only those from the limited number of events in the dataset and simulated samples. |
 | The fitted width divided by the mean of the \EToverPT distribution as a function of the track $|\eta|$ in three \pTtrack ranges: $30<\pTtrack<50$~\GeV, $50<\pTtrack<70$~\GeV\ and $70<\pTtrack<100$~\GeV. Also shown is the fitted width of the track \pT divided by the generator-level \pT for true $\tau\rightarrow\pi^\pm\nu$ events in simulation to give an illustration of the contribution to the total width from the resolution of reconstructed tracks. The uncertainties shown are only those from the limited number of events in the dataset and simulated samples. |
 | The fitted width divided by the mean of the signal \EToverPT distribution as a function of the track $|\eta|$ in three \pTtrack ranges: $30<\pTtrack<50$~\GeV, $50<\pTtrack<70$~\GeV\ and $70<\pTtrack<100$~\GeV. Also shown is the fitted width of the track \pT divided by the generator-level \pT for true $\tau\rightarrow\pi^\pm\nu_\tau$ events in simulation to give an illustration of the contribution to the total width from the resolution of reconstructed tracks. The uncertainties shown are only those from the limited number of events in the dataset and simulated samples. |
 | The fitted width divided by the mean of the \EToverPT distribution as a function of the track $|\eta|$ in three \pTtrack ranges: $30<\pTtrack<50$~\GeV, $50<\pTtrack<70$~\GeV\ and $70<\pTtrack<100$~\GeV. Also shown is the fitted width of the track \pT divided by the generator-level \pT for true $\tau\rightarrow\pi^\pm\nu$ events in simulation to give an illustration of the contribution to the total width from the resolution of reconstructed tracks. The uncertainties shown are only those from the limited number of events in the dataset and simulated samples. |
 | The fitted width divided by the mean of the signal \EToverPT distribution as a function of the track $|\eta|$ in three \pTtrack ranges: $30<\pTtrack<50$~\GeV, $50<\pTtrack<70$~\GeV\ and $70<\pTtrack<100$~\GeV. Also shown is the fitted width of the track \pT divided by the generator-level \pT for true $\tau\rightarrow\pi^\pm\nu_\tau$ events in simulation to give an illustration of the contribution to the total width from the resolution of reconstructed tracks. The uncertainties shown are only those from the limited number of events in the dataset and simulated samples. |
 | The fitted width divided by the mean of the \EToverPT distribution as a function of the track $|\eta|$ in three \pTtrack ranges: $30<\pTtrack<50$~\GeV, $50<\pTtrack<70$~\GeV\ and $70<\pTtrack<100$~\GeV. Also shown is the fitted width of the track \pT divided by the generator-level \pT for true $\tau\rightarrow\pi^\pm\nu$ events in simulation to give an illustration of the contribution to the total width from the resolution of reconstructed tracks. The uncertainties shown are only those from the limited number of events in the dataset and simulated samples. |
 | The fitted width divided by the mean of the signal \EToverPT distribution as a function of the track $|\eta|$ in three \pTtrack ranges: $30<\pTtrack<50$~\GeV, $50<\pTtrack<70$~\GeV\ and $70<\pTtrack<100$~\GeV. Also shown is the fitted width of the track \pT divided by the generator-level \pT for true $\tau\rightarrow\pi^\pm\nu_\tau$ events in simulation to give an illustration of the contribution to the total width from the resolution of reconstructed tracks. The uncertainties shown are only those from the limited number of events in the dataset and simulated samples. |
 | The average energy within each hadronic layer normalised to the track momentum as a function of track \pT in the barrel (left) and endcaps (right). Also shown are the ratios of the sum of energies in all layers of the hadronic calorimeter to the track momentum. Data are required to have $0.2<\EToverPT<1.1$ to primarily select single-pion events. Shown in the lower panel is the ratio of data to simulation. The error bars and uncertainty band show the uncertainties from the limited number of events in the dataset and simulated samples. |
 | The average energy within each hadronic layer normalised to the track momentum as a function of track \pT in the barrel (left) and endcaps (right). Also shown are the ratios of the sum of energies in all layers of the hadronic calorimeter to the track momentum. Data are required to have $0.2<\EToverPT<1.1$ to primarily select single-pion events. Shown in the lower panel is the ratio of data to simulation. The error bars and uncertainty band show the uncertainties from the limited number of events in the dataset and simulated samples. |
 | The average energy within each hadronic layer normalised to the track momentum as a function of track \pT in the barrel (left) and endcaps (right). Also shown are the ratios of the sum of energies in all layers of the hadronic calorimeter to the track momentum. Data are required to have $0.2<\EToverPT<1.1$ to primarily select single-pion events. Shown in the lower panel is the ratio of data to simulation. The error bars and uncertainty band show the uncertainties from the limited number of events in the dataset and simulated samples. |
 | The average energy within each hadronic layer normalised to the track momentum as a function of track \pT in the barrel (left) and endcaps (right). Also shown are the ratios of the sum of energies in all layers of the hadronic calorimeter to the track momentum. Data are required to have $0.2<\EToverPT<1.1$ to primarily select single-pion events. Shown in the lower panel is the ratio of data to simulation. The error bars and uncertainty band show the uncertainties from the limited number of events in the dataset and simulated samples. |
 | The fitted response as a function of track \pT in the barrel (left) and endcaps (right) after requiring the fraction of the associated energy that is in the hadronic calorimeters to satisfy $f^{\textrm{had}}>85\%$. The error bars and uncertainty band show the uncertainties from the limited number of events in the dataset and simulated samples respectively. |
 | The fitted response as a function of track \pT in the barrel (left) and endcaps (right) after requiring the fraction of the associated energy that is in the hadronic calorimeters to satisfy $f^{\textrm{had}}>85\%$. The error bars and uncertainty band show the uncertainties from the limited number of events in the dataset and simulated samples respectively. |
 | The fitted response as a function of track \pT in the barrel (left) and endcaps (right) after requiring the fraction of the associated energy that is in the hadronic calorimeters to satisfy $f^{\textrm{had}}>85\%$. The error bars and uncertainty band show the uncertainties from the limited number of events in the dataset and simulated samples respectively. |
 | The fitted response as a function of track \pT in the barrel (left) and endcaps (right) after requiring the fraction of the associated energy that is in the hadronic calorimeters to satisfy $f^{\textrm{had}}>85\%$. The error bars and uncertainty band show the uncertainties from the limited number of events in the dataset and simulated samples respectively. |